Robot Commenters Accidentally Expose Themselves on China's Weibo Platform

A widely circulated image representation of China's 50 cent party and a screen capture of the robot 50 cents' mechanical comments on student Pu Zhiqiang's winning of mathematic contest. (via letscorp.net)

A widely circulated image representation of China's 50 cent party and a screen capture of the robot 50 cents’ mechanical comments on student Pu Zhiqiang's winning of mathematic contest. (via letscorp.net)

Patrick Wong contributed to this post.

Chinese netizens are having a good laugh over the mechanized missteps of government-controlled robot commenters, who have been criticizing messages sent by their own masters.

A few weeks ago, a group of robots seized upon a congratulatory message posted on Weibo over a year ago by the Zhenjiang government information office (@鎮江發布). The message read:

〔江大學子獲國際大學生數學建模大賽一等獎〕2014年美國(國際)大學生數學建模競賽(MCM/ICM)中,江大由理學院金鑫、汽車學院浦志强、電氣學院段倩三名同學組建的數學建模競賽團隊,打敗哈佛、西點軍校等世界各地的競爭對手,獲得了此次數學建模競賽的一等獎,太牛了!

[Jiangsu University students won the International Mathematical Contest in Modeling] In the 2014 USA (International) MCM/ICM contest, Jiangsu University contest team which composed of Jin Xin from the science faculty, Pu Zhiqiang from the automobile faculty, Duan Qian from the electronic faculty had beaten other international competitors from Harvard, The United States Military Academy and won the outstanding award. This is awesome!

One of the students happened to be named Pu Zhiqiang. This is also the name of a prominent human rights lawyer who was indicted on charges of “inciting ethnic hatred” and “picking quarrels and provoking a disturbance” on May 15, 2015, after spending over a year in detention. Nearly a dozen robots targeted the message during the Pu's trial, posting new comments that focused on the need to crack down on crime and uphold rule of law.

The old message suddenly re-emerged on the Weibo timeline on May 7, thanks to the new comments. Each user account randomly posted two or three comments from the following list:

- 知法犯法,支持警方嚴懲
– 嚴勵打擊!知法犯法
– 律師犯罪知法犯法應該嚴懲!支持警方的做法
– 律師應該是傳遞正能量的職業,嚴勵打擊違法犯罪的律師
– 希望能夠懂法守法
– 律師犯罪知法犯法應該嚴懲!
– 無論是什麼職業,違抗法律就應該「收」到法律的嚴懲
– 支持警方依法打擊犯罪,無論是什麼職業,違抗法律就應該「收」到法律嚴懲

- Break the law with intention, support the police's severe punishment.
– Iron hand crack down! Break the law with intention
– Lawyers have knowledges of the law, they break the law with intention, should punished severely! Support police action.
– Lawyers should be an occupation that deliver positive energy. Serious crackdown on law breaking lawyers is necessary.
– Wish people can learn the law and obey the law.
– Lawyer who breaks the law with intention should be severely punished.
– Regardless of occupation, those who break the law should “get” punishment from the law.
– Support police crackdown on crime according to law. Regardless of occupation, those who break the law should “get” punishment from the law.

The comments came from the following Weibo user accounts: User pqbqeo4de0 (@用戶 pqbqeo4de0), “AMH old circle is a fire plier” (@AMH老圈是一把火鉗), Beta H (@貝特H), @Rummnigge, Summer of Gardenia Tea (@栀子茶的夏天), User q311p6pm (@用戶q211p6pm), “A flock of birds near skyline” (@天邊一群鳥), “Bring down the white ship” (@打倒大白熊), Rainless sky (@失雨天空) and @jade-stern.

The way in which the comments appeared suggested that the program, which controls groups of robotic user accounts, has been equipped with a keyword database containing sensitive words, such as individuals’ names like Pu Zhiqiang or the names of other dissidents in China. The program appears to crawl data on Weibo, which contains the keywords.

Once they catch a post, the robot users flood the comment area and randomly post from a set of standardized comments, such as the one above. Although it is an open secret that the social media is flooded with pro-government commenters nicknamed “the 50 Cent Party” (commenters are reportedly paid .50 per comment), netizens’ jaws dropped when they saw the flood of mechanical and awkward messages attached to this outdated and relatively innocuous news post.

Chen Jiang laughed at the 50 Cents:

如果你還不相信有五毛這個職業存在的話,可以來看評論了。媽呀,笑的不行了,我歇會兒的。

If you don't believe the existence of 50 Cents, please come here and take a look at the comments. My mum, I laughed too hard, need to take a rest.

It seems likely that the comments were prepared by a single source, as the last two comments contain identical typographical errors (收 / get).

Jelitto commented on the automation of 50 Cents:

微博是輿論重地,必須得佔領,但沒想到有人私吞維穏款用機器五毛!!以前我以為五毛是團委的學生,監獄的犯人,各地的新聞中心的人,沒想到第一個自動化的產業是五毛!!

Weibo is the battlefield of public opinion, has to occupy it. But how can they claimed the stability maintenance money while leaving their jobs to robot 50 cents!! I used to believe that 50 cents are students from the Communist Youth League, prisoners in jail, people working in news centers. Can't imagine 50 cents can be automated.

Weibo user “Whistle on the horse” came to the same conclusion:

原來有個浦志強,不過是學生,並不是今日受審的律師…. 可是評論裡一群討伐律師的…… 原來機器五毛和鎖定關鍵詞是這回事……

That's the reason, there is a Pu Zhiqiang but he is a student, not the lawyer who is on trial today… But so many comments are attacking the lawyers… So that's how the robot 50 cents and keyword detection work…

As more and more netizens mocked the stupidity of the 50 Cents, the incident also helped spread word of Pu Zhiqiang's indictment. On May 15, this news thread together with all of the above comments was deleted from Weibo. But Letscorp.net, a site devoted to bridging news between mainland China and other Chinese-speaking communities, screen captured the news and some of the comments.

Now, in addition to government-hired and voluntary student online commentators, we can see the robot 50 Cents on social media. It is no wonder that Chinese netizens are leaving Weibo in droves.

1 comment

Join the conversation

Authors, please log in »

Guidelines

  • All comments are reviewed by a moderator. Do not submit your comment more than once or it may be identified as spam.
  • Please treat others with respect. Comments containing hate speech, obscenity, and personal attacks will not be approved.


Support our work defending online freedom of expression around the world.

justice+matters

Learn why our work is important »

Donate now

Close