This article was written by Mahsa Alimardani for ARTICLE19. You can see the original ARTICLE19 statement here .
When the high-profile Iranian Instagram users Maedeh Hojabri, Elnar Ghasemi, Shadab Shakib and Kami Yousefi were arrested in May 2018, it signaled a new phase in state efforts to control expression on Instagram.
The arrests of these high profile Instagram users sparked a worldwide outcry after the government forced the 18-year-old Hojabri to confess to the “crime” of posting videos of herself dancing.
We hit the #London  pavement today, dancing in solidarity with #MaedehHojabri  who has been sentenced to prison for dancing. Maedeh is one of so many brave Iranians fighting for their human rights. #DancingIsNotACrime , #برقص_تا_برقصیم . Dance with us!🕺🏽💃🏽 pic.twitter.com/DR2EyaOOt1 
— Yasamin Alttahir (@YasaminAlttahir) July 9, 2018 
Tension around Instagram has been mounting since the start of 2018, when protests spread across the country and Iranian authorities temporarily blocked online platforms Instagram along with Telegram. Both sites are extremely popular in Iran.
By the end of April, Telegram was fully blocked — but Instagram remained open. Instead of blocking the platform, it appears that authorities are instead using it to track the activities of Iranians, and control Instagram content by arresting those who are not following the laws of the land.
The judiciary began threatening to filter Instagram at the beginning of July 2018, arguing that it has enabled the “illicit activities” of so-called Instagram celebrities.
What happened to Maedeh Hojabri
Hojabri had been inactive on social media since May — but her fate was unknown until 9 July, when the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB) TV network aired a forced confession  video that included several of the detained Instagram users, including Hojabri.
Although these videos did not air until July, it appears that the detainees were forced to give their confessions shortly after their arrest. A male detainee identified as Kami Yousefi indicates that it is the month of June throughout his confessions. In one moment, a person behind the camera asks a female detainee if her family knew she was arrested. She responds, telling the camera: “they realized when they came to our house to arrest me this morning.”
On 3 July 2018, the deputy Prosecutor General Hajatoleslam Mohamad Mosadegh indicated to semi-official Fars News  that there had been “activities under the title of celebrities in cyberspace and fraudulent profiteering.” The deputy prosecutor said that because of these concerns, the Prosecutor's office had  to “cut off the hands of these people [from Instagram] and bring confidence back to society.”
Officially, no charges have been filed against the detainees. However on the day of the broadcast, the head of Tehran’s cyber-police (known as FATA ), Touraj Kazemi, told the Iranian Labour News Agency (ILNA)  that the administrators of multiple “criminal” Instagram pages had been detained, largely in Tehran, and that “appropriate measures” were being taken. Kazemi indicated that these arrests were associated with various “celebrities of Instagram pages.” Psychologist Dr. Hagh Ranjbar, interviewed by IRIB in their 9 July broadcast , referred to the issue as “the societal ills of the celebrities of Instagram pages who try to promote themselves.”
Video of IRIB documentary on Instagram arrests in Persian.
According to Article 638 of Iran’s Islamic Penal Code , dancing is considered a “sinful act” and can be punished with two months imprisonment and 74 lashes (see the full details of Article 638 below). Similar charges  were brought in May 2014 against several Iranians who made and shared a fan-video  for the Pharrell Williams song “Happy” on social media.
Due process violations persist
The forced confessions contribute to long-standing concerns regarding violations of due process in the country’s judicial system, and the use of the state broadcasting system to promote government narratives on arrested human rights defenders, journalists, academics and social media users. IRIB broadcasts have previously been used to promote conspiracy theories against dual nationals  Nazanin Zaghari Ratcliffe and Seyed Kavous-Emami.
In a 2014 report, the Center for Human Rights in Iran demonstrated how forced “confessions”  are often extracted under the threat torture, and then broadcast by the state-run IRIB media to justify politically motivated prosecutions.
Since December, Iranians have faced new hurdles to accessing the internet and engaging in online speech — there have been shutdowns of foreign traffic, censorship of the widely used Telegram messaging platform, and many arrests of social media users, journalists, activists and human rights defenders.
In reaction to the judiciary’s statement that Instagram would be filtered, Rouhani’s Minister of Information Communications and Technology tweeted that these were false rumors. Instead, he said the unfiltering of Twitter, which has been blocked in Iran since 2009, is the real consideration.
موضوع پیگیری برخی برای “فیلتر” سرویسهای مختلف اینترنتی تازگی ندارد. “رفع فیلتر” توئیتر در صف انتظار جلسه کارگروه تعیین مصادیق قرار دارد. آنچه تازگی دارد طرح یک موضوع قدیمی توسط برخی رسانهها برای انحراف افکار عمومی از مطالبهگری #شفاف_سازی  سوءاستفاده کنندگان ارزی اخیر است
— MJ Azari Jahromi (@azarijahromi) July 4, 2018 
The issue that’s been followed for the filtering of various Internet services is not new. The unfiltering of of Twitter is in line to be discussed in the next meeting of the working group to determine offensive content. What’s new in this is the discussion of this irrelevant news by certain media to distract public opinion from the issue of transparency in the matter of currency devaluation.
Similar statements were made by this Minister in the weeks before the Judiciary blocked Telegram in late April.
Rhetorically, the Rouhani administration has long argued for greater freedoms of online. But the events of recent months make these promise ring hollow.
Article 638 of the Iranian Islamic Penal Code:
Anyone in public places and roads who openly commits a harām (sinful) act, in addition to the punishment provided for the act, shall be sentenced to two months’ imprisonment or up to 74 lashes; and if they commit an act that is not punishable but violates public prudency, they shall only be sentenced to ten days to two months’ imprisonment or up to 74 lashes.
Note – Women, who appear in public places and roads without wearing an Islamic hijab, shall be sentenced to ten days to two months’ imprisonment or a fine of fifty thousand to five hundred Rials.