Netizen Report: Turkey to Tighten Grip on Digital Speech

Demonstrators in Turkey, 2013. Photo by Alan Hilditch via Flickr (CC BY 2.0)

Demonstrators in Turkey, 2013. Photo by Alan Hilditch via Flickr (CC BY 2.0)

James Losey, Renata Avila, Hae-in Lim, Sonia Roubini, Grady Johnson, Bojan Perkov, Ellery Roberts Biddle, and Sarah Myers contributed to this report.

Global Voices Advocacy's Netizen Report offers an international snapshot of challenges, victories, and emerging trends in Internet rights around the world. This week's report begins in Turkey, where authorities are making moves to curb online rights in the wake of June’s anti-government protests and a major corruption scandal that resulted in a series of arrests and changes to Prime Minister Erdogan’s cabinet. A draft law currently before Parliament would give the Turkish government new powers to access and retain user data, and to block content deemed illegal in “emergency” situations without judicial oversight. The law would also require all Internet service providers to join a state-run association that would drive the implementation of content and data-related policies.

With elections nearing, the government is already extending political control online. Last week, Twitter lit up with reports that the popular video-sharing site Vimeo had been blocked temporarily in the country, the result of a federal court decision. Vimeo was used widely for sharing videos of last year’s Taksim Gezi Park protests.

Free Expression: “Freedom of the press is limited to those who own one”

As India prepares for national elections in May, media commentators are expressing concern about the impartiality and independence of India’s press. Getting to the bottom of media ownership is a labyrinthine task, but increasing swaths of India’s 400 TV channels and more than 80,000 publications are coming under the ownership of politicians and their affiliates, according to the Committee to Protect Journalists. India’s Caravan Magazine discusses how political parties abuse their media holdings by controlling coverage, citing New Yorker columnist A. J. Liebling’s famous quip, “freedom of the press is limited to those who own one.”

The Russian Federal Protective Service (FSO) is asking software developers to design a system that automatically monitors the country’s news and social media, producing reports that study netizens’ political attitudes.

Filmmakers in China are turning to online video sharing sites like Youku Tudou to produce films on subjects deemed controversial by Chinese censors. Largely funded by major brands, short films on topics like LGBT issues are attracting growing attention.

Thuggery: Repression surges on eve of Egypt’s referendum

Egypt’s current leadership has called on citizens to vote on a constitutional referendum that would signal public approval of the military government and its July ouster of former President Mohamed Morsi. In the weeks leading up to the vote, activists on various sides of the political debate have faced heightened consequences for their actions. Last week, activists Alaa Abd El Fattah, Mona Seif, and ten others received a one-year suspended sentence on unfounded accusations that they set fire to a campaign office of ex-Presidential candidate Ahmed Shafiq. Alaa was sentenced in absentia, as he is currently in pre-trial detention on a separate charge concerning a protest that took place on November 26. Egyptian scholar Rasha Abdulla writes: “Activists in Egypt believe these cases and others are merely political in nature, and meant to keep prominent activists behind bars while intimidating others to keep them away from the political process.”

A wide range of friends and activists have rallied behind their cause, and have contributed blog posts on the subject. Here are just a few of them:

On January 8, 2014, extremist Somali militia Al-Shabab issued an ultimatum to Somalia’s Internet service providers: Cut Internet access within 15 days—or face “serious consequences.” Three days later, the Somali Minister of Interior and National Security urged companies to ignore the threat and condemned it, citing the right to free expression enshrined in the country’s constitution. Ironically, Al-Shabab has a major presence on Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube, which it relies on to disseminate its views.

Vasyl Pawlowsky, English-language curator of Maidan Monitoring, a web platform set up to follow events and news from Euromaidan protests in several cities throughout Ukraine, reported in a blog post that the crowdsourced site has been inaccessible since Monday, January 13 due to what he suspects is a DDoS attack.

Surveillance: ‘Safe Harbor’ not enough for Europeans

The European Parliament Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (LIBE) released a draft report on the NSA scandal and mass surveillance, calling on the European Commission to review data sharing agreements with the United States and arguing that “Safe Harbour principles do not provide adequate protection for EU citizens.”

Privacy: New feature Google+ targets secret admirers?

A new Google+ feature allows anyone on Google+ to send a message to your Gmail inbox. The feature will not reveal your actual email address to all users, unless you choose to respond to their emails. Users concerned about the privacy implications of the feature have the option to limit who can email them through Google+ or opt out entirely.

Industry: Tech giants made a “good faith effort” on human rights — but is that enough?

Five years ago, leading NGOs focusing on human rights in the digital age joined Google, Microsoft and Yahoo! to form the Global Network Initiative (GNI), a coalition effort to improve company policies and practices as they relate to human rights. Last week, the GNI released its first public report on independent assessments of the three companies — the report found that each company is making a “good faith effort” to implement GNI’s Principles on Freedom of Expression and Privacy.

US digital rights group Access praised the effort but pointed to some critical gaps in the assessment process. According to Access, independent assessors “struggled to obtain all of the necessary information about the companies’ policies and practices” — due in part to legal limitations on disclosure of national security-related data requests, but also to internal company decisions. Case studies on specific threats to user rights served as a focal point for assessment, but these studies were selected by companies themselves, rather than the assessors or the non-corporate members of the GNI, who represent some of the world’s leading experts on human rights in the digital era.

Publications and Studies


Subscribe to the Netizen Report by email


Start the conversation

Authors, please log in »


  • All comments are reviewed by a moderator. Do not submit your comment more than once or it may be identified as spam.
  • Please treat others with respect. Comments containing hate speech, obscenity, and personal attacks will not be approved.